GridLayer Operator View
UK DNO 1

Document Review

Review application documents and agent-cited evidence. TAC-2026-0007

Reviewing documents for Cicero Wind Scheme

Bundle references

1 / 4

Evidence Zero

Red Line Boundary Plan 9 (v2)

Structured document preview (seed-rendered, same surface as the application report)

Red-line boundary plan — controlled extract

Application referenceTAC-2026-0007
ProjectCicero Wind Scheme
Developer / clientBins - Kub SPV Ltd
Parent developerWiza Group
Document (as filed)Red Line Boundary Plan 9 (v2)
Inferred typered line boundary plan
Categoryland rights
Document date2026-05-06T17:42:12.000Z

This extract identifies the proposed development boundary for Cicero Wind Scheme (TAC-2026-0007) at Macyfield Site: 365 Bogan Mountains, Lake Gustaveton. The red-line extent is recorded as 1000 acres and should be read alongside title and access plans in the land bundle.

The access corridor is shown as RL-02, but the easement owner and wayleave instrument are not named on the plan.

The red-line plan identifies the development extent, access corridor, cable route option, and exclusion zones for Macyfield Site: 365 Bogan Mountains, Lake Gustaveton.

Plan elementCodeDescription
Development extentRL-01Primary generation and ancillary infrastructure boundary (edged red).
Access corridorRL-02Construction and operational access route to public highway.
Cable route optionRL-03Indicative export cable alignment to connection interface.
Exclusion zoneRL-04Sensitive habitat and offset zone excluded from permanent works.

The plan marks an access track but does not identify affected third-party rights, public rights of way, or wayleave counterparties.

Coordinate and annotation references

Coordinate geometry and parcel overlays are maintained in the GIS source package. This PDF extract is a controlled representation for review and traceability; engineering set-out must use the survey-grade source files.

Boundary checks for readiness review

- Confirm red-line area is consistent with land option/lease acreage assumptions.

- Verify access and easement corridors are represented in ownership evidence.

- Confirm planning submission plans and technical layout plans reference the same boundary revision.

Cited Extracts

  • [1] Red Line Boundary Plan 9 (v2) · p.1

    Red line boundary encloses 127 acres for the proposed installation.

  • [2] Red Line Boundary Plan 9 (v2) · p.1

    The access corridor is shown as RL-02, but the easement owner and wayleave instrument are not named on the plan.

  • [3] Red Line Boundary Plan 9 (v2) · p.1

    The red-line plan identifies the development extent, access corridor, cable route option, and exclusion zones for the land interests described in the application schedules.

  • [4] Red Line Boundary Plan 9 (v2) · p.1

    The plan marks an access track but does not identify affected third-party rights, public rights of way, or wayleave counterparties.