Evidence Zero
Correspondence 2
Structured document preview (seed-rendered, same surface as the application report)
Project correspondence log and extracts
| Application reference | TAC-2026-0007 |
|---|---|
| Project | Cicero Wind Scheme |
| Developer / client | Bins - Kub SPV Ltd |
| Parent developer | Wiza Group |
| Document (as filed) | Correspondence 2 |
| Inferred type | correspondence |
| Category | correspondence |
| Document date | 2026-05-06T17:42:12.000Z |
This correspondence pack collates principal clarifications and responses for Cicero Wind Scheme (TAC-2026-0007) exchanged between the project team and reviewing parties in support of readiness assessment.
The correspondence log records clarifications exchanged with reviewing parties on transformer lead times, red-line drawings, and planning conditions.
| Date | Ref | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-10 | COR-014 | Clarification on transformer procurement lead times and FAT witness windows. |
| 2026-02-17 | COR-018 | Updated red-line and access drawing cross-reference issued. |
| 2026-02-25 | COR-022 | Response to planning condition discharge query. |
Several email threads end with “we will revert” without a dated connection-offer status or modification reference.
No outage requirements, network access windows, or commissioning access constraints are stated.
Extracted correspondence themes
- Programme dependencies and long-lead procurement timing.
- Boundary, land rights, and title consistency checks.
- Technical assumptions used in network studies and protection submissions.
Cited Extracts
[1] Correspondence 2 · p.1
No outage requirements, network access windows, or commissioning access constraints are stated.
[2] Correspondence 2 · p.1
The correspondence log records clarifications exchanged with reviewing parties on transformer lead times, red-line drawings, and planning conditions.
[3] Correspondence 2 · p.1
Several email threads end with “we will revert” without a dated connection-offer status or modification reference.